Volume 7, Issue 4 (2018)                   JFST 2018, 7(4): 263-270 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 20.1001.1.23225513.1397.7.4.8.3

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Norouzi M, Bagheri Tavani M. The Assessment of the Accumulation and Consumption Hazard of Five Heavy Metals in Eleven Species of Fish in Persian Gulf Waters (Bandar Mahshahr, Khuzestan Province). JFST 2018; 7 (4) :263-270
URL: http://jfst.modares.ac.ir/article-6-26816-en.html
The Assessment of the Accumulation and Consumption Hazard of Five Heavy Metals in Eleven Species of Fish in Persian Gulf Waters (Bandar Mahshahr, Khuzestan Province)
M. Norouzi1 , M. Bagheri Tavani * 2
1- Marine Biology & Fisheries Sciences Department, Marine Biology Faculty, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
2- Young Researchers & Elite Club, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran , mostafa.bagheri@toniau.ac.ir
Abstract:   (7255 Views)
  • The goal of this study was to determine the absorption of five toxic heavy metals (Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, Chromium, and Arsenic) in muscle tissues of eleven species of fish in the waters of Khuzestan province- Bandar Mahshahr.
Material and Methods: For this purpose, 66 fishes, with the typical market weight were randomly selected. After performing biometrics assessment on samples, the muscle tissue was removed. The amount of estimated daily intake (EDI), estimated weekly intake (EWI), maximum allowable consumption limit (Cr), maximum allowable meals consumed (CR) and adults and the hazard quotient of the consumption of these fishes with regard to non-cancerous diseases (THQ) for 11 species were calculated.
  • The concentration of metals was lower in comparison with the standards of MAFF, NHMRC and WHO, but in some cases was higher than USEPA standard. The hazard quotient for non-cancerous diseases all eleven species less than one, and for lead, cadmium, mercury, chromium, and arsenic, was calculated to be 0.018, 0.0237, .0428, 0.1146, and 0.0295, respectively. Also, the total hazard index (HI) in this research was obtained to be 0.221.
  • The analysis of the accumulation and consumption hazard of five heavy metals in eleven species under study from the coastal waters of Khuzestan- Bandar Mahshahr shows that although the consumption of these fishes any hazard to consumers in connection with their health, however, with regard to the amount of their consumption by pregnant women and children considerations must be complied with.
Keywords: Fish, Toxic (heavy) metals, Persian Gulf, Hazard index, Target Hazard Quotient (THQ)
Full-Text [PDF 857 kb]   (3426 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Aquativc toxicology
Received: 2018/08/9 | Published: 2018/12/20
References
1. Mortazavi MS, Sharifian S. Mercury bioaccumulation in some commercially valuable marine organisms from Mosa Bay, Persian Gulf. Int J Environ Res. 2011;5(3):757-62. [Link]
2. Neves D, Sobral P, Ferreira JL, Pereira T. Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish off the Portuguese coast. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;101(1):119-26. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.008]
3. Ozden O. Seasonal differences in the trace metal and macrominerals in shrimp (Parapenaus longirostris) from Marmara Sea. Environ Monit Assess. 2010;162(1-4):191-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10661-009-0787-y]
4. World Health Organization & International Programme on Chemical Safety. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, health criteria and other supporting information. 2nd Volume. 2nd Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996. pp. 31-388. [Link]
5. Koshafar A, Velayatzadeh M. Risk assessment to consumers from mercury in Acanthopagrus latus. J Food Hyg. 2016;6(3):21-33. [Persian] [Link]
6. Mardoukhi S, Hosseini SV, Hosseini SM. Risk to consumers from mercury in croaker (Otolithes ruber), from the Mahshahr port. Fish Sci Technol. 2013;2(3):43-55. [Persian] [Link]
7. Ahmadi Kordestani Z, Hamidian A, Hosseini V, Ashrafi S. Risk assessment of mercury due to consumption of edible aquatic species. J Mar Biol. 2013;5(1):63-70. [Peraian] [Link]
8. Akhbarizadeh R, Moore F, Keshavarzi B. Investigating a probable relationship between microplastics and potentially toxic elements in fish muscles from northeast of Persian Gulf. Environ Pollut. 2018;232:154-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.028]
9. Malakootian M, Seddiq Mortazavi M, Ahmadi A. Heavy metals bioaccumulation in fish of Southern Iran and risk assessment of fish consumption. Environ Health Eng Manag J. 2016;3(2):61-8. [Link] [DOI:10.15171/EHEM.2016.02]
10. Askary Sary A, Karimi Sary V. Measurement and comparative of iron levels and Hazard Quotient (HQ) on muscle of farmed and marine fishes from Khuzestan, South West of Iran. Iran Sci Fish J. 2017;25(5):1-10. [Persian] [Link]
11. Esmaili Sari A, Abdollahzadeh E, Joorabian Shooshtari Sh, Ghasempouri SM. Fish consumption limit for mercury compounds. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2011;1(2):82-9. [Persian] [Link]
12. Keshavarzi B, Hassanaghaei M, Moore F, Rastegari Mehr M, Soltanian S, Lahijanzadeh AR, et al. Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment in three commercial fish species in the Persian Gulf. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;129(1):245-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.02.032]
13. Sadeghi N. Morphological and biological characteristics of Southern Iranian fishes (Persian Gulf and Oman Sea). Tehran: Naghshe Mehr; 2001. [Persian] [Link]
14. Lakshmanan R, Kesavan K, Vijayanand P, Rajaram V, Rajagopal S. Heavy metals accumulation in five commercially important fishes of Parangipettai, Southeast coast of India. Adv J Food Sci Technol. 2009;1(1):63-5. [Link]
15. Blackmore G. 2001. Interspecific variation in heavy metal body concentrations in Hong Kong marine invertebrates. Environ Pollut. 2001;114(3):303-11. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00086-0]
16. UNEP, FAO, IAEA, IOC. Sampling of selected marine organisms and sample preparation for trace metal analysis [Internet]. Nairobi: UNEP; 1984. 2015 [cited 2017 Sep 21]. Available from: http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/1364?show=full [Link]
17. EPA. Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites [Internet]. Washington DC: USEPA; 2002 [cited 2017 Nov 19]. Available from: http://bit.ly/2xOcm5L [Link]
18. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). EPA/823-B94-004: Guidance for assessing chemical contamination data for use in fish advisories volume II, risk assessment and fish consumption limits. Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2000. [Link]
19. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). EPA/600/R-09/052F: Exposure actors handbook. Washington DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment; 2011. [Link]
20. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). Risk-based concentration table environmental protection agency. Philadelphia PA/Washington DC: 2011. [Link]
21. EPA. EPA-503/8-89-002: Assessing human health risks from chemically contaminated fish and shellfish: A guidance manual [Internet]. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1989 [cited 2017 Sep 19]. Available from: http://bit.ly/2JGUFdM [Link]
22. Cooper CB, Doyle ME, Kipp K. Risks of consumption of contaminated seafood: The Quincy Bay case study. Environ Health Perspect. 1991;90:133-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1289/ehp.90-1519503]
23. Chien LC, Hung TC, Choang KY, Yeh CY, Meng PJ, Shieh MJ, et al. Daily intake of TBT, Cu, Zn, Cd and As for fishermen in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ. 2002;285(1-3):177-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00916-0]
24. Canli M, Atli G. The relationships between heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) levels and the size of six Mediterranean fish species. Environ Pollut. 2003;121(1):129-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00194-X]
25. Sobhanardakani S, Tayebi L, Farmany A, Cheraghi M. Analysis of trace elements (Cu, Cd, and Zn) in the muscle, gill, and liver tissues of some fish species using anodic stripping voltammetry. Environ Monit Assess. 2012;184(11):6607-11 [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10661-011-2445-4]
26. Milošković A, Dojčinović B, Kovačević S, Radojković N, Radenković M, Milošević D, Simić V. Spatial monitoring of heavy metals in the inland waters of Serbia: a multispecies approach based on commercial fish. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(10):9918-33. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11356-016-6207-2]
27. Akoto O, Bismark Eshun F, Darko G, Adei E. Concentrations and health risk assessments of heavy metals in fish from the Fosu lagoon. Int J Environ Res. 2014;8(2):403-10. [Link]
28. Kotze P, Du Preez HH, Van Vuren JHJ. Bioaccumulation of copper and zinc in Oreochromis mossambicus and Clarias gariepinus, from the Olifants River, Mpumalanga, South Africa. Water SA. 1999;25(1):99-110. [Link]
29. Esmaili Sari A, Abdollahzadeh E, Joorabian Shoostari Sh, Ghasempouri M. Fish Consumption Limit for Mercury Compounds. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2011;2(1):24-31. [Persian] [Link]
30. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome: 2009. [Link]
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.