Journal of Fisheries Science and Technology

Journal of Fisheries Science and Technology

Effects of extruding wheat flour under different temperature and humidity conditions on its biochemical analysis, phenolic compounds and digestibility by common carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Hojjatollah Alamdari
Khadije Musavi
Department of Fishery, Faculty of Natural Resources, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Khuzestan, Iran
Abstract
The extrusion process is widely used in making aquatic feeds. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of extrusion on biochemical analysis, removal of phenolic compounds and protein and carbohydrate digestibility of wheat flour in common carp. In treatments 1, 2 and 3 wheat flour was mixed with tap water at the rate of 250, 100 and 200 ml per kg of flour and then extruded by a single-axis extruder under the temperature of 120, 135 and 120 °C, respectively. Treatment 4 (control) was not subjected to the conditions of dough preparation and then extrusion. Extruding had no significant effect on the amount of crude protein and ash of wheat flour (p>0.05) but it significantly decreased the content of crude lipid, total phenolic compounds and non-tannin phenolic compounds and increased the digestibility of carbohydrate and protein (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the amount of crude protein, crude lipid, ash and non-tannin phenolic compounds in the extruded treatments, but significantly the lowest amount of total phenolic compounds was recorded in treatments 1 and 2. Significantly, the highest carbohydrate digestibility was obtained in treatments 1 and 2, and the highest protein digestibility was observed in treatment 2. In total, treatment 2 (135 °C and 100 ml tap water per kg flour) was recognized as the best extruded wheat flour for common carp.
Keywords
Biochemical analysis
common carp
Extrusion
In-vitro digestibility
Wheat flour

Subjects

1. Konovalenko LY, Nemenushchaya LA, Shchegolikhina TA. Techniques for up-to-date aquaculture compound feed production facilities. Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 954: 012038.
2. Suleiman R, Rosentrater KA. Techno-economic analysis (TEA) of extruded aquafeeds. Journal of Food Research. 2018, 7(5): 57-68.
3. Damude HG, Kinney AJ. Enhancing plant seed oils for human nutrition. Plant Physiology; 2008. 147(3): 962-968.
4. Vidal LVO, Xavier TO, Moura LB, Michelato M, Martins EN, Furuya WM. Apparent digestibility of wheat and coproducts in extruded diets for the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal. 2017; 18(3): 479-491.
5. Khoshkholgh M, Mosapour Shajani M, Mohammadi M. Partial replacement of wheat flour and corn meal with olive pomace in diet of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): effects on growth performance, body composition, hematological parameters and sensory evaluation. Iranian Journal of Aquatic Animal Health. 2020; 6(1): 63-77.
6. Tacon AGJ. Standards methods for the nutrition and feeding of farmed fish and shrimp. Volume 3, feeding methods, Argent Laboratories Press, USA, 1990; 208 p.
7. Nikmaram N, Leong SY, Koubaa M, Zhu Z, Barba FJ, Greiner R, Oey I, Roohinejad S. Effect of extrusion on the anti-nutritional factors of food products: An overview. Food Control. 2017; 79: 62-73.
8. Kokoua F, Fountoulaki E. Aquaculture waste production associated with antinutrient presence in common fish feed plant ingredients. Aquaculture. 2018; 495: 295–310.
9. Wan J, Xi Q, Tang J, Liu T, Liu C, Li H, Gu X, Shen M, Zhang M, Fang J, Meng X. Effects of pelleted and extruded feed on growth performance, intestinal histology and microbiota of juvenile red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Animals. 2022; 12: 2252.
10. Lewis MJ, Francis DS, Blyth D, Moyano FJ, Smullen RP, Turchini GM, Booth MA. A comparison of in-vivo and in-vitro methods for assessing the digestibility of poultry by-product meals using barramundi (Lates calcarifer); impacts of cooking temperature and raw material freshness. Aquaculture. 2019; 498: 187–200.
11. Cousin M, Cuzon G, Guillaume J, AQUACOP. Digestibility of starch in Penaeus vannamei: in vivo and in vitro study on eight samples of various origin. Aquaculture. 1996; 140: 361-372.
12. Montoya-Martinez C, Nolasco-Soria H, Vega-Villasante F, Carrillo-Farnes O, Alvarez-Gonzalez A, Civera-Cerecedo R. In vitro protein digestibility of animal, vegetal and microbial feed ingredients for Macrobrachium tenellum. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research. 2018; 46 (3) 495-501.
13. Talebian Nik SS, Alamdari H. Adding Iranian oak acorn (Quercus brantii) to the diet of common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) and its effects on growth performance, carcass composition and resistance to salinity stress. Scientific Journal of Iranian Fisheries (in Persian). 2020; 29(2), 83-91.
14. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis 17th ed. Washington D.C. 2000; 2200 p.
15. Thiex N, Novotny L, Crawford A. Determination of ash in animal feed: AOAC official method 942.05 revisited. Journal of AOAC international. 2012; 95 (5): 1392-1397.
16. Narui M, Alamdari H. The effect of nutrition with soaked and fermented Iranian acorn (Quercus brantii) on the growth, feed utilization and carcass composition of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Scientific Journal of Iranian Fisheries (in Persian). 2022; 31(1), 47-56.
17. Makkar HPS. Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage. A laboratory manual. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/International Atomic Energy Agency. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. 2003; 102 P.
18. Walker JM. The protein protocols handbook, second ed. Humana Press. Totowa, New Jersey, 2002; 1146 p.
19. Khan A, Ghosh K. Phytic acid-induced inhibition of digestive protease and α-amylase in three Indian major carps: An in vitro study. Journal of the world aquaculture society. 2013; 44 (6): 853-859.
20. Kattakdad S, Jintasataporn O, Worawattanamateekul W, Chumkam S. pH characterization of digestive enzyme and in vitro digestibility of red bee shrimp Caridina cantonensis (Decapoda: Atyidae). Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development. 2018; 9 (2): 1-6.
21. Mazaheri Tehrani Z, Keramat Amiri A. Investigate of the physical properties of extruded and pressed pellets for rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Quarterly scientific research journal of animal environment (in Persian). 2017; 8(4), 171-178.
22. Milani E, Goli Movahedi G, Jafari M. The effect of formulation variables and extrusion process conditions on functional and nutritional properties of wheat bran. Food science and nutrition (in Persian). 2020; 17(1), 5-14.
23. Rathod RP, Annapure US. Effect of extrusion process on antinutritional factors and protein and starch digestibility of lentil splits. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2016; 66: 114-123.
24. Grela E, Studzinski T, Matras J. Antinutritional factors in seeds of Lathyrus sativus cultivated in Poland. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter. 2001; 2(2): 101-104.
25. Wilson RP. Utilization of dietary carbohydrate by fish. Aquaculture. 1994; 124: 67-80.
26. Singh S, Gamlath S, Wakeling L. Nutritional aspects of food extrusion: A review. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2007; 42(8): 916-929.
27. Venou B, Alexis MN, Fountoulaki E, Haralabous J. Performance factors, body composition and digestion characteristics of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) fed pelleted or extruded diets. Aquaculture Nutrition. 2009; 15: 390–401.
28. Li XQ, Xu HB, Sun WT, Xu XY, Xu Z, Leng XJ. Grass carp fed a fishmeal-free extruded diet showed higher weight gain and nutrient utilization than those fed a pelleted diet at various feeding rates. Aquaculture. 2018; 493: 283–288.
29. Badrie N, Mellowes W. Effect of extrusion variables on cassava extrudates. Journal of Food Science. 1991; 56(5): 1334-1337.